Tony Asleson
2014-08-14 17:02:23 UTC
On IRC we discussed that the following URI formats worked in testing (at
least with lsmcli):
smispy+ssl://***@emc-smi/?no_ssl_verify=yes
smispy+ssl://***@emc-smi?no_ssl_verify=yes
The two URIs are technically different. The first one has a 'path'
component, which in this case is '/'. The second one has no path component.
As the path is not used in any of the plug-ins that I am aware of, its
presence or absence is irrelevant. Obviously this may change for a
future plug-in.
I added a test to the unit test and the public C function, lsm_uri_parse
handles both of these URIs as expected.
least with lsmcli):
smispy+ssl://***@emc-smi/?no_ssl_verify=yes
smispy+ssl://***@emc-smi?no_ssl_verify=yes
The two URIs are technically different. The first one has a 'path'
component, which in this case is '/'. The second one has no path component.
As the path is not used in any of the plug-ins that I am aware of, its
presence or absence is irrelevant. Obviously this may change for a
future plug-in.
I added a test to the unit test and the public C function, lsm_uri_parse
handles both of these URIs as expected.